AI Bibliography
AI Bibliography |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Nguyen, T. N., McDonald, C., & Gonzalez, C. (2023). Credit assignment: Challenges and opportunities in developing human-like ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08171. |
| Resource type: Journal Article BibTeX citation key: Nguyen2023 View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Science, Complexity Science, Computer Science, Data Sciences, Decision Theory, General, Neuroscience Subcategories: AI transfer learning, Augmented cognition, Chaos theory, Decision making, Deep learning, Human decisionmaking, Human learning, Machine learning, Neurosymbolic Creators: Gonzalez, McDonald, Nguyen Publisher: Collection: arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08171 |
| Attachments |
| Abstract |
|
Temporal credit assignment is crucial for learning and skill development in natural and artificial intelligence. While computational methods like the TD approach in reinforcement learning have been proposed, it's unclear if they accurately represent how humans handle feedback delays. Cognitive models intend to represent the mental steps by which humans solve problems and perform a number of tasks, but limited research in cognitive science has addressed the credit assignment problem in humans and cognitive models. Our research uses a cognitive model based on a theory of decisions from experience, Instance-Based Learning Theory (IBLT), to test different credit assignment mechanisms in a goal-seeking navigation task with varying levels of decision complexity. Instance-Based Learning (IBL) models simulate the process of making sequential choices with different credit assignment mechanisms, including a new IBL-TD model that combines the IBL decision mechanism with the TD approach. We found that (1) An IBL model that gives equal credit assignment to all decisions is able to match human performance better than other models, including IBL-TD and Q-learning; (2) IBL-TD and Q-learning models underperform compared to humans initially, but eventually, they outperform humans; (3) humans are influenced by decision complexity, while models are not. Our study provides insights into the challenges of capturing human behavior and the potential opportunities to use these models in future AI systems to support human activities.
|